Details in a press release show that The Prime Minister chaired the BRICS session on “Inclusive Global Governance and Strengthening Multilateralism” on September 12, 2026 during the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi. This event, as outlined in the Ministry of External Affairs press release, marks a significant moment in the group’s ongoing efforts to reshape the international order. The statement does not address the specific composition or voting structures of BRICS, but it does highlight a core strategic objective: increased representation for nations historically marginalized in global governance. The stated goal—shifting the “pyramid of privilege” into a “platform of partnership”—suggests a recognition of existing imbalances and a desire to rectify them through a redefined multilateral framework.
Background
The session occurred within the broader context of the 18th BRICS Summit, an annual gathering of the Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa group. Prior to this summit, the Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement on September 13, 2026, detailing Prime Minister Modi’s meeting with the President of South Africa on the sidelines of the summit. The statement from September 13, 2026, indicates that Prime Minister Modi met with H.E. Cyril Ramaphosa, President of the Republic of South Africa, on 13th September 2026. This meeting, as described in the earlier statement, occurred “on the sidelines of the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi.” The statement does not mention any prior discussions or agreements leading up to this session. The press release itself does not elaborate on the specific history of BRICS cooperation, only presenting the current objectives of the session.
Analysis
The Prime Minister’s remarks reveal a core tension within the BRICS framework. The emphasis on the “Global South” – specifically, the assertion that this region is “at the front row of global crises, but the back row of decision-making” – directly challenges the existing power dynamics within the bloc. This suggests a recognition that the current composition of BRICS, dominated by China and Russia, does not adequately reflect the challenges faced by nations in the Global South. The proposal to transform the “pyramid of privilege” into a “platform of partnership” indicates a desire to redistribute influence and decision-making power. The statement does not address the potential challenges of achieving this goal, particularly given the diverse interests and priorities of the five member states. The planned negotiations with Seafarers, as outlined, represent a targeted effort to address a specific vulnerability – the lack of support for seafarers during crises – highlighting a recognition of a particular sector’s needs.
Implications
The adoption of the New Delhi BRICS Leaders’ Declaration, as detailed in the press release, sets the shared priorities, commitment, and direction for BRICS cooperation going forward. Should the declaration be implemented as described, it could signal a shift in the group’s overall approach to global governance. The focus on increased representation and a “platform of partnership” suggests a potential recalibration of BRICS’s role in international institutions, particularly the United Nations Security Council. The proposed training and expertise for policymakers from the Global South could have significant implications for the development of future diplomatic talent in these nations. The establishment of a Seafarers Emergency Support Network represents a tangible commitment to addressing a specific vulnerability within the global trade system.
Outlook
If the visit yields a renewed commitment to the principles outlined in the New Delhi BRICS Leaders’ Declaration, the group’s influence could grow, particularly in addressing global crises. Should the declaration be translated into concrete action, the impact on the UN Security Council could be modest, given the veto power held by China and Russia. The proposed Seafarers Emergency Support Network, if successfully established, could provide a vital safety net for seafarers and contribute to greater stability in global trade. The statement does not address the potential for disagreements among BRICS members regarding the implementation of these initiatives.
