The Kingdom's Response to Baseless Allegations and Threats against Sovereignty
The recent landmine explosions along the Cambodian-Thailand border have raised concerns about the fragile truce and the stability of the region. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the Kingdom of Cambodia categorically rejects the false and inflammatory allegations made by Thailand, which accused Cambodian armed forces of planting anti-personnel mines in areas disputed by both countries.
As tensions escalate, it is essential to examine the historical background, motivations, and responses from key stakeholders. The 1904 Convention and 1907 Treaty established the borders between Cambodia and Thailand, with maps produced by the Commissions of Delimitation serving as a reference point for decades. However, these agreements have been repeatedly breached by Thailand, in complete disregard to the terms of the ceasefire.
The incidents along the border are not new; they are part of a pattern of provocation that has preceded Thailand's unlawful armed offensive on 24 July 2025. Cambodia remains committed to resolving outstanding boundary disputes exclusively through peaceful means, in strict conformity with international law. The Kingdom reiterates its principled position that no national border may be altered through the threat or use of force.
Historical Background and Context
The 1904 Convention and 1907 Treaty established the borders between Cambodia and Thailand.
The 1962 Judgment of the International Court of Justice and the 2013 Interpretation concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear have long been accepted by both States as defining the boundaries.
The 2000 Memorandum of Understanding on the Survey and Demarcation of Land Boundary prohibits unilateral military activities in un-demarcated areas.
Key Stakeholders and Motivations
Thailand's actions are motivated by a desire to regain control over disputed territory and assert its dominance in the region.
Cambodia seeks to maintain regional stability and security through peaceful means, in accordance with international law.
The International Court of Justice remains the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and the most credible institution for resolving outstanding boundary disputes.
Recent Developments
Thailand's Commander of the Second Army Region made provocative statements on 10 August 2025, vowing to "reclaim" Ta Krabey Temple and "close" Tamone Temple.
The incidents along the border are part of a larger pattern of provocation that has preceded Thailand's unlawful armed offensive on 24 July 2025.
Expert Insights
"The allegations made by Thailand are baseless and devoid of credible evidence," said Dr. Yim Chhavy, Director-General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation. "Cambodia remains committed to resolving outstanding boundary disputes exclusively through peaceful means, in strict conformity with international law."
"Thailand's actions are a clear breach of its obligations under the ASEAN Charter and the 28 July 2025 ceasefire agreement," added Dr. Sophal Egg, Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "The region needs a robust, impartial, and independent monitoring mechanism to ensure full respect for the agreed ceasefire."
Future Impact
In the short term (next 6 months), it is essential that both countries engage in constructive dialogue and work towards establishing a robust monitoring mechanism to prevent further escalation.
In the long term (5–10 years), Cambodia's commitment to peaceful resolution of outstanding boundary disputes will remain unchanged. The Kingdom will continue to prioritize regional stability and security, while upholding its international obligations and promoting sustainable development.
Conclusion
The recent landmine explosions along the Cambodian-Thailand border serve as a reminder of the fragility of the truce and the importance of diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation. As the region navigates these complex issues, it is crucial that both countries remain committed to peaceful resolution and uphold their international obligations.