São Paulo, August 15, 2025 – Brazil has submitted a request for consultations with the United States under the Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization (WTO), citing violations of WTO commitments and bilateral trade agreements.
The Brazilian government's move comes in response to recent tariff measures imposed by the US, which could result in up to 50% tariffs on a wide range of Brazilian products. The tariffs were adopted based on U.S. legislation, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974.
Brazil's Foreign Ministry stated that the US measures are "blatantly violating core commitments undertaken within the WTO framework," including the Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) principle and tariff bindings negotiated under that organization. The Brazilian government reiterates its willingness to engage in negotiations and hopes that the consultations will contribute to resolving the issue.
The request for consultations is a formal step under the WTO dispute settlement system, which aims to resolve trade disputes between member countries through dialogue and negotiation. Bilateral consultations are designed to allow the parties to seek a negotiated solution before the possible establishment of a panel.
Key points:
Brazil seeks consultation with the US on tariff measures imposed under WTO dispute settlement
Tariffs could result in up to 50% tariffs on Brazilian products
Measures allegedly violate core WTO commitments, including MFN principle and tariff bindings
Consultations aim to resolve issue through negotiation
The date and venue of the consultations are yet to be agreed upon by the two parties. Brazil's Foreign Ministry emphasized its commitment to engaging in constructive dialogue to find a mutually beneficial solution.
In conclusion, Brazil's request for WTO consultation with the US highlights the ongoing challenges in trade relations between the two countries. The dispute raises concerns about the impact on bilateral trade and the adherence of US policies to international agreements. As negotiations proceed, it is essential to monitor developments in this matter, as they may have implications for global trade dynamics.