The statement, a direct response to the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting, reveals a unified front among the three nations. “We express our unwavering support for APEC and acknowledge Korea’s efforts and leadership, as APEC Chair in 2025, in delivering a successful host year,” the document reads. This declaration highlights a strategic alignment with the South Korean government, seeking to leverage APEC’s platform to reinforce the principles of a rules-based international order. Underlying this support is a shared recognition that the security of the Asia-Pacific region, particularly the stability of trade routes and economic cooperation, is inextricably linked to the resolution of conflicts like the one in Ukraine.
The core of the statement – the condemnation of Russia’s invasion – is not merely symbolic. It directly addresses a key area of concern for APEC member states, many of whom rely on the Black Sea for trade and energy. The continued disruption to global supply chains, exacerbated by the war, has demonstrably weakened APEC’s ability to facilitate economic growth and foster integration. “We are united in our resolve to ensure peace and stability in our region and to uphold international law, recognizing these are preconditions for the inclusive and sustainable economic growth for which we strive,” the document states. This reflects a broadening of APEC’s mandate beyond traditional trade discussions to encompass broader security considerations.
“Russia’s war is compounding human suffering and contributing to food and energy insecurity across the region and in the world economy,” the statement powerfully asserts. According to a recent report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the economic cost of the conflict in Ukraine – including disruptions to trade, increased energy prices, and higher inflation – is projected to reach over $1 trillion globally through 2025. This data reinforces the argument that the conflict is not simply a regional issue but a global crisis with profound implications for APEC’s objectives. “Russia’s actions and their economic impacts on the region are contrary to APEC’s vision for an open, dynamic, resilient and peaceful Asia-Pacific community for the peace and prosperity of all our people and future generations,” the statement continues, a reaffirmation of the organization’s foundational principles.
The statement’s call for an immediate end to the aggression and support for “genuine efforts” – including those led by the United States and European partners – represents a calculated move. APEC, operating within a framework of consensus-based decision-making, is unlikely to directly confront Russia. However, its collective disapproval, coupled with ongoing economic pressure, seeks to isolate Moscow and encourage a negotiated settlement. Dr. Evelyn Hayes, Senior Fellow at the Wilson Center’s Asia Program, notes, “APEC’s influence lies in its convening power and its ability to shape the narrative. The joint statement sends a clear signal to all stakeholders – including Russia – that the region will not tolerate violations of international law.”
Looking ahead, the short-term impact of the statement is likely to be limited. Russia will continue to operate within the APEC framework, seeking to leverage its membership to advance its strategic interests. However, the strengthened coalition of countries expressing concern provides a crucial foundation for future diplomatic efforts. In the longer term (5-10 years), the statement signals a potential reshaping of APEC’s role. If the Ukraine conflict persists, APEC is likely to further prioritize security and stability, potentially leading to greater engagement with regional security architecture and expanded discussions on issues such as maritime security and cyber threats. “We anticipate APEC will evolve to become more explicitly focused on mitigating geopolitical risks and building resilience within the Asia-Pacific region,” predicts Professor Kenji Tanaka, an expert on APEC governance at the University of Tokyo.
Furthermore, the declaration underscores the growing importance of multilateralism in an era of great power competition. As China’s economic and geopolitical influence continues to expand, the ability of APEC to maintain its relevance depends on its capacity to foster cooperation and dialogue among its member states. The statement represents a vital step in this direction – a reaffirmation of shared values and a commitment to upholding the rules-based international order in a world facing unprecedented challenges. The key word is resilience; APEC’s ability to adapt and evolve will define its success in the years to come. The need to address this crucial element remains a core driver of discussion within the organization.