Key stakeholders involved in this evolving dynamic include Thailand, of course, alongside key ASEAN members like Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam. China’s growing economic and military presence in the region, coupled with its strategic investment in the Port City of Kyaukphyu, poses a significant challenge to Thailand’s interests, particularly regarding maritime security and access to vital waterways. Myanmar, grappling with a devastating civil war, represents a destabilizing force, generating a massive humanitarian crisis and creating a security vacuum that attracts external actors. Data from the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) indicates over 1.8 million internally displaced persons within Myanmar in late 2025, placing immense strain on neighboring countries, including Thailand, which has become a primary destination for refugees. “The sheer scale of the displacement crisis is fundamentally altering the operational parameters for Thailand,” stated Dr. Evelyn Davies, Senior Fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), “requiring a move from primarily diplomatic engagement to a more active, and potentially more interventionist, approach.”
Recent developments over the past six months underscore this shift. In November 2025, Thailand deployed naval vessels to patrol the Gulf of Thailand, ostensibly to combat piracy and illegal fishing, but widely interpreted as a demonstration of power and a signal of concern over Chinese naval expansion. Simultaneously, Bangkok increased its engagement with the United States, seeking renewed security assistance and reaffirming its commitment to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), despite ongoing objections from some within the Thai parliament. Furthermore, Thailand’s ambassador to ASEAN actively pushed for a stronger coordinated response to the Myanmar crisis, advocating for a more robust mechanism for humanitarian assistance and accountability. This increased assertiveness reflects a recognition that the status quo is no longer viable.
Looking forward, short-term (next 6 months) outcomes point to continued volatility within the Mekong region. The refugee crisis will likely intensify, placing further strain on Thailand’s resources and potentially exacerbating social tensions. Increased Chinese naval activity will necessitate continued vigilance and diplomatic efforts to maintain regional stability. Long-term (5-10 years), the outlook is more uncertain. A protracted conflict in Myanmar could lead to a fragmented and unstable region, creating opportunities for extremist groups and disrupting regional supply chains. Competition for resources – specifically Mekong River water – will undoubtedly intensify, potentially sparking interstate tensions. The rise of ASEAN’s “Maritime Security Initiative” offers a potential framework for managing these challenges, but its success hinges on the willingness of member states, including Thailand, to embrace a more proactive and collaborative approach. The development of more robust regional disaster response mechanisms, coupled with greater investment in border security, will be crucial. “Thailand’s future prosperity and security are inextricably linked to the stability of the Mekong,” noted a senior official at the Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a closed-door briefing earlier this year, “a reality demanding a sustained, strategic, and multifaceted response.”