HomeUnited NationsEL expert on Myanmar: Safety Council resolution not sufficiently strong on 'systematic...

EL expert on Myanmar: Safety Council resolution not sufficiently strong on ‘systematic gross human being rights violations’

He was in accord with Security Council members Norway, the particular United Arab Emirates, america, Iceland, and Mexico in saying that the language of the resolution should have been stronger. It also urged “concrete and immediate actions” in the direction of implementing a peace plan , that was agreed to by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and called to uphold “democratic institutions and processes”. Instead, targeted action is necessary, including coordinating sanctions, slicing off revenue that financial situation the junta’s military assaults, and an embargo on weapons and dual-use technologies.

Quality long time coming

Unsplash/Pyae Sone Htun “It is certainly, therefore , imperative that those nations with the political will to support the people of Myanmar take coordinated action immediately to finish the carnage”. The Council has long been divided on how to deal with the crisis – with China plus Russia arguing against strong action. They, along with India, abstained from Wednesday’s election while the remaining 12 people voted in favor. “‘Demanding that certain actions be taken without any use of the Security Council ’s Chapter VII authority, will not stop the illegal Myanmar zirkel from attacking and wrecking the lives of the fifty four million people being kept hostage in Myanmar”, he said in a statement .

Quality lacks strength

“What is required is the politics will”, he concluded. He underscored that the resolution should not become “a dead-end…followed by a lot more international inaction”. “It is clearly time for your creation of a working coalition of nations who are prepared to stand with the people of Myanmar by providing what they require most – action”.

‘Wake-up’ call

The UN expert agreed with the Secretary-General’s declaration last month saying that the international community had failed Myanmar. Mister. Andrews spelled out that “the systematic gross human legal rights violations – amounting to war crimes and offences against humanity – becoming perpetrated daily on the individuals of Myanmar by an illegal military junta requires strong, coordinated action simply by UN Member States”. Young people take part in a pro-democracy demonstration in Myanmar. After the election, China’s ambassador, Zhang Jun, said that his country had wanted the Security Council to adopt a formal statement on Myanmar, not a resolution.   Russia’s ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, said that as Moscow failed to view the situation in Myanmar as a threat to worldwide peace and security, this believed that it should not be addressed by the Council. Thomas Andrews,   Special Rapporteur within the situation of human legal rights in Myanmar , known as “notable” that the Council crafted and advanced a draft that managed to avoid a veto, but “with all of the due respect”, said that the particular resolution adopted yesterday had not been enough.

Young people take part in a pro-democracy demonstration in Myanmar.
Exclusive Rapporteurs are appointed with the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council to examine and report back on a specific human rights country circumstance. The experts are not paid for their work.

The particular resolution makes clear nevertheless , that the action required to end the crisis would not originate from the Security Council, the EL expert said.

International failure

The resolution expressed “deep concern” at the continuing state associated with emergency since the military grabbed power and the “grave impact” of the coup on Myanmar’s people. “It can be a wake-up call for those nations who support a people below siege”, he continued. He or she acknowledged that the resolution’s needs – including an immediate end to all forms of violence, the release of political prisoners, unimpeded humanitarian access, and regard for the rights of women and children – are “critically important” but missing are “consequences for the failure to meet them and the imposition associated with sanctions and accountability regarding crimes the military offers committed to date”. “What is necessary is action”. “This failure cannot be rectified by resolutions that have no consequences”, stressed Mr. Andrews.


Stay Connected
Must Read
Related News