HomeUnited NationsSecurity Council urged to ‘end the bloodshed’ in Gaza

Security Council urged to ‘end the bloodshed’ in Gaza

“If adopted, it will mean that the killings in Gaza will continue. It will mean that the vicious act of violating international law and international humanitarian law will continue,” he said. “China has no hesitation in exercising its veto against a draft resolution that will have such serious consequences.” Russian Deputy Ambassador Dmitry Polyansky said his country and China vetoed the US draft resolution which “not only was not geared towards ending hostilities in Gaza, but which essentially gave Israel carte blanche to continue its inhumane operations which run counter to international humanitarian law”. 

Death, destruction and division 

The Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine, Riyad Mansour, noted that the General Assembly called for a cessation of hostilities 20 days after the start of the conflict.“I urge all those with leverage to do all in their power to end the bloodshed in Gaza now.” he said. “Let us see the end of the waiting, including for the peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in line with the two-State solution, as the only credible formula for lasting resolution.” He noted that since the start of the war in October, the international community has been overwhelmingly calling for a ceasefire and an end to the fighting, demanding the Security Council take concrete action.  “Now these resolutions need to be fully respected and fully implemented so the genocide in Gaza can stop; so families on both sides can reunite in life, not death,” he said. 

‘End the bloodshed’ 

Dennis Francis convened the UN’s most representative body, comprising all 193 Member States, following the Security Council’s failure to adopt a resolution put forward by the United States last month.  Mr. Francis outlined the terrible toll in Gaza, which includes more than 32,500 Palestinians killed, 1.7 million displaced, and over 1.1 million facing a catastrophic level of food insecurity. He said Russia’s decision to veto “was the only correct way” as it allowed for the other resolution to be adopted, “the heart of which was a direct demand for an immediate establishment of a ceasefire for the period of Ramadan, which is to result and lead to a lasting ceasefire.” Ambassador Dai Bing of China said its decision to veto was based on the need to uphold international justice, the purposes and dignity of the UN Charter, and the responsibility and authority of the Security Council. 

Veto ‘the only correct way’: Russia 

The debate was triggered by a 2022 Assembly resolution that calls for a meeting within 10 working days whenever a veto is cast in the Council. During the Council meeting on 22 March, China and Russia vetoed a US draft resolution which stated the “imperative” for “an immediate and sustained ceasefire to protect civilians on all sides”. “Once again, we convene under this initiative as conflict in Gaza rages into its sixth bloody month, as death and destruction rule the day, and as divisions among Member States, especially in the Council, persist,” Mr. Francis said. 

Killing would continue: China 

The grave concerns and strong dissatisfaction of Arab States with the draft resolution were also taken into account. A month later, the Assembly demanded an immediate humanitarian ceasefire, stressing the need to protect civilians and stem what was already a dire humanitarian catastrophe. Meanwhile, the Security Council took nearly six months to do the same. Furthermore, the US draft deviated from the consensus of Council members and ran counter to the expectations of the international community.  Three days later, the Council adopted a different resolution – which many had vowed to support – calling for a ceasefire for the remainder of Ramadan as well as the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Resolution 2728 was drafted by its 10 non-permanent members. Russia, China and the US are permanent members of the 15-member Council, together with France and the United Kingdom, and they all have the right to veto any decision. Non-permanent member Algeria also voted against the resolution

He implored Security Council members to meaningfully use their power in support of an immediate and lasting ceasefire. 

Fully implement resolutions: Palestine 

While welcoming resolution 2728, he lamented that “it comes after five painful months of division, bloodshed and unconscionable loss.” “However, the United States, as a country with significant influence over the parties concerned, has repeatedly obstructed the Council’s voice on the ceasefire and has vetoed four times against the Council’s efforts to promote an immediate ceasefire,” he said. He pointed to the “historic responsibility” that permanent members have regarding the maintenance of international peace and security, saying “it is specifically for this that the veto mechanism exists in order to prevent the pushing through of nefarious and dangerous initiatives at the Security Council.” 

More to follow…


Stay Connected
Must Read
Related News