Fagrådet – Rusfeltets hovedorganisasjon (Norway); World Humanitarian Drive (United Kingdom); International Human Rights Commission La Commission Internationale des Droits de l’homme Mezinárodní komise pro lidská práva – nadační loving, ve zkrácené formě IHRC – nadační fond (Czech Republic) — as the associated with Armenia asked for more information about its legal status and funding as an intergovernmental base; General Union of Arab Experts (Morocco) — as the representative of Bahrain mentioned the organization’s significant costs and requested detailed financial statements for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022; Merciful Souls (Al-Qolub Al-Rahima) (R/A) (Israel) — as the representative of China asked about examples of its revolutionary approaches to humanitarian relief; The Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations continued its 2023 session today, recommending 8 entities for special consultative status with the Economic and Social Council and deferring action on 84 other people. Luftbrücke Irak e. V. (Germany) — as the representative of Türkiye asked for its cooperation with the United Nations Entity for Gender Equal rights and the Empowerment of Women (UN-Women); The Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations will fulfill again at 3 l. m. on Tuesday, 31 January, to continue its session. The Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations recommended the Economic and Social Council grant special consultative standing to the following 8 entities: “The Awakening” A Society for Social & Social Development (Pakistan) — because the representative of Pakistan requested information on the organization’s work in the location of good governance; Association Des Juristes Specialises En Droits Etrangers (France) – as the representative of Algeria asked for details on the worldwide scope of its activities; First of the meeting, the representatives of Pakistan, Cuba, Türkiye and India engaged in an analysis with the Chief of the NGO Branch, expressing concern more than their lack of opportunity to pay for sufficient consideration to answers submitted by organizations soon before, or during, the meeting. Such representatives continued to highlight specific types of this as the meeting progressed. Citing the human-resources and financial constraints faced with the Branch, the Chief suggested how the Committee resolve this matter during an informal meeting. Authorities for Sustainable Peace plus Development (India) — since the representative of Pakistan asked for information regarding the organization’s sources of funding for certain projects; Asociación Civil Grupo SURES (Venezuela) — because the representative of the United States inquired the group to provide a list of meetings it has attended under the auspices of the Economic Commission to get Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), and contributions made to the latter; Royal College of Obstetricians plus Gynaecologists (United Kingdom); Fondazione Pangea ONLUS (Italy) — because the representative of Türkiye asked for an explanation of its main private-sector contributor; The Committee also discussed procedures regarding the timeline for reviewing responses from non-governmental organizations. Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc. (United States) — as the representative of China requested information regarding its global cooperation; Public Association “Regional Consumer Protection Society” (Belarus) — as the representative of the United States asked the organization to provide types of projects conducted in 2022, along with their beneficiaries and financing sources; Ilankai Thamil Sangam, Inc. (United States) — as the representative of Nicaragua asked for more details regarding its activities for the promotion of Thamil culture, language plus music in the United States; Centre pertaining to Participatory Democracy (India) — as the representative of India said the organization has not yet responded to specific questions posed into it by the Committee, including about such details as the sites of its ground-level activities; Association Femmes Solidaires (AFS) (France) — as the representative of Türkiye asked for information regarding the nature from the registration; Centre for Research and Development (India) — as the representative of Pakistan asked if the organization is needed to report to the Government, from which it receives major funding; Al-Quds University (State of Palestine) — as the representative of Israel asked for a list of the organizations from which it receives funding; The Committee postponed action within the application of the following 84 businesses: Centro Intercultural de Estudios de Desiertos y Océanos A. C (Mexico) — as the representative of Türkiye asked how the organization has the capacity to operate under a financial deficit; International Youth Federation (United Kingdom) — as the representative of Algeria requested further information about activities within member countries; Dr . APJ Abdul Kalam International Foundation (India) — as the representative of China asked for more examples of concrete tasks in support of the group’s stated mission, and how they give rise to the work of the Economic and Social Council; Human Rights Protection Group and MFP Federation (India) — because the representative of Indian requested a breakdown of the 1, 556 phone calls it reported having obtained; Organization of Women for Awareness & Motivation (AWAM) (Pakistan) — as the representative of Pakistan asked for details regarding its organizational members; Belarusian Fund associated with Peace (Belarus) — as the representative of the United States requested more information on the type of treatment provided to veterans, orphans and other specific groups described in the organization’s application; Association of Non-for-Profit Organizations to Facilitate the Drug Prevention and Socially Dangerous Behaviour “National Anti-Drug Union” (Russian Federation) — as the representative of the United States asked, if the group is accredited, which United Nations body, meetings and conferences will it expect to participate in, and what efforts does it hope to make; Welfare Association Jared (Pakistan) — as the representative of India requested details about two of the group’s projects, namely those focusing on “women’s enjoyment of legal rights empowerment and leadership” and “electoral equality and inclusiveness”; Sri Sharada Institute of Indian native Management Research Foundation (India) — as the representative of Pakistan asked for a financial statement to get 2021-2022; China Group Companies Association (China) — as the representative of Cuba inquired why the organization’s costs are higher than its earnings and how it finances alone; Association to get Social Solidarity and Empowerment Training Trust (India) — as the representative of India observed that the organization mentioned getting mobilized 10 million Native indian rupees in its application, plus requested details on the sources of that funding; Center for Military Human Rights Korea (Republic of Korea) — because the representative of Cina asked the organization to provide more details about the financing received from the Open Community Foundation in 2019 and 2020; Legal Aid Community (Pakistan) — as the representative of India asked for segregated data regarding the contributions the organization received from international sources and Government authorities; Human Rights Initiative (India) — as the representative of India said the organization has not however provided detailed information on its projects and programmes, since requested by the Committee, plus requested it to do so; Best Practices Policy Project, Inc. (United States) — as the representative of Bahrain asked for information regarding its contractual connection with grantors; Peace Justice Humanity and Relief Foundation (India) — as the representative of India asked for a set of completed reports from your organization; Global Alumni Alliance (Russian Federation) — as the representative of the United Kingdom asked how the organization will be able to guarantee its independence in the Government; Corporate Counsel Ladies of Color Inc (United States); and MENA Legal rights Group (Switzerland) — as the representative of His home country of israel asked for a full list of donors; Stichting InterNations Exchange (Netherlands) — since the representative of Cina asked for information regarding certain training training courses held by the organization; Stichting White Helmets Base (Netherlands) — as the associated with Cuba asked for a breakdown of the funding for each of its projects; Österreichischer Rat Für Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Österreichischer Nachhaltigkeitsrat für soziale, ökologische und ökonomische Angelegenheiten (Austria) — as the representative of Israel mentioned its opinions and suggestions commissioned by the Economic and Social Council. Worldwide Society of Criminology (United States) — as the associated with China asked if it acquired any overseas offices; Girija Prasad Koirala Foundation for Democracy Peace and Development (Nepal) — as the representative of India asked the organization to provide details about projects partially funded by Government; The 19-member Committee views applications for consultative position and requests for reclassification submitted by non-governmental institutions (NGOs). Once an application has been reviewed and approved by the Committee it is considered recommended for consultative status. Agencies which were granted general plus special status can go to meetings of the Council plus issue statements, while those with general status can also talk during meetings and recommend agenda items. Organizations along with roster status can only attend meetings. Den Norske Helsingforskomité (Norway)— as the representative of Cuba asked for clarification regarding funding received from international organizations; Coppieters Foundation (Belgium) — as the representative of T ü rkiye asked the organization in order to clarify the difference between its full members and connect members; Ceasefire Center for Civilian Rights (United Kingdom) — as the representative of Eritrea asked for more information in regards to the group’s members and how it is able to conduct its activities with no members on the ground in countries where it works; PAY-W Center (India) — as the representative of India asked for details about the cancer and palliative care services provided by the group — through web-based interfaces in and cooperation with private hospitals — as well as about any services provided in foreign countries; Feminist Legal Clinic Inc. (Australia) — as the representative of Türkiye requested details regarding a certain data source maintained by the organization; Samajik Yuva Sangthan Sansthan (India) — as the representative of Pakistan asked for details on any platform the organization has built for youngsters; Association Achbal Maroc culturelle et artistique (Morocco) — as the representative of Algeria asked it to further elaborate upon its relationship with other non-governmental organizations that provide it with funding; VIDEA the BC-Based International Development Education Association (Canada); Kite Oxford (United Kingdom) — as the representative of Algeria requested a summary of the projects this undertook over the last two years; Special Consultative Status Solidariteit/Solidarity (South Africa) — as the representative of Algeria inquired the organization to provide more details about its legal fund, including recent examples of activities it has undertaken; Action on several applications was postponed because Committee associates requested further information from the applicants about, among other products, details of their organizations’ actions, partners, expenditures and sources of funding. Water, Environment and Sanitation Society – WESS (Pakistan) — as the representative of Pakistan asked for a breakdown of the financing the organization receives from global organizations; TMG Research gGmbH (Germany) — as the representative of Nicaragua requested information regarding how it guarantees its independence because of Government funding; NTC-Hands away Cain (Italy) — because the representative of Pakistan asked for information on its advocacy programmes plus names of the countries by which they were conducted; International Cultural Diversity Organization (Austria) — as the representative of Algeria asked how the organization has borrowed its activities since 2019; Roosevelt House General public Policy Institute (United States) — as the representative of Bahrain asked the organization how it intends to contribute to the job of the Economic and Social Council if it is granted consultative status; Centre for International Promotion Fund (Russian Federation); Frontrunners club de développement kklk compétences de la strive (Morocco) — as the associated with Algeria asked for more information concerning its financial-transparency policies; Youth Parli of Pakistan (YPP) (Pakistan) — since the representative of Pakistan asked for details of scholarships the organization arranged intended for students over the last three years; Stichting Offer Activists (Netherlands) — as the representative of Türkiye asked for details regarding a certain handbook produced by the organization; Georgian academy of criminology sciences (Georgia) — as the associated with the Usa asked for details regarding funding it obtained from a certain organization; Zamzam Foundation (Somalia); ARCS Arci Culture Solidali APS (Italy) — since the representative of T ü rkiye asked for details about the organization’s unspent resources; Disability: IN (United States). Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos (Colombia) — as the representative of China requested the organization to correct its site to use United Nations terminology meant for “Taiwan” and “Hong Kong”; Moscow Helsinki Group (Russian Federation) — as the representative of Cuba inquired the organization to clearly show the amount it receives from the Potanin Foundation; Magistrats Europeens pour la Democratie et les Libertes (MEDEL) (Germany) — as the representative of Türkiye asked about its annual conferences and how they are funded; A. Deb. A. M. (Association d’aide aux migrants) (France) — as the representative of Algeria requested details regarding its membership rights categories; Canadian Lutheran Entire world Relief (Canada) — as the representative of Tiongkok asked for details regarding certain projects that the organization received funding through Government agencies; Syrian Legal Growth Programme (United Kingdom) — as the representative of Cuba asked for clarification on one of its programmes; International Human Right Organization (Pakistan) — as the representative of Pakistan requested information on any routines undertaken by the organization in regards to “advocacy for accountability”; Coalition pour l’abolition de la prostitution (CAP) (France) — as the representative of Nicaragua requested a list of the projects this implemented in 2021-2022; Khalsa Aid International (United Kingdom) — as the representative of Pakistan asked for details regarding the local and international partners which it works on health projects; Suomalaiset kehitysjärjestöt – Finnish Development NGOs Fingo (Finland) — because the representative of Türkiye asked how the organization ensures its institutional independence; Öz Gida Sanayi Ve Yardimci İşçileri Sendikasi (Türkiye) — as the representative of Armenia asked for information on specific projects it implemented with foreign organizations; The particular VII Foundation Inc. (United States) — as the representative of Cuba asked how it preserves its independence in light of private-sector funding; MIKE pour les droits ainsi que libertés (Switzerland) — since the representative of Algeria asked for more information about the nature of its relationship with volunteers; Protection International (Belgium) — as the representative of Cuba asked how the organization preserves its independence from the Government authorities with which it works; Yadam Institute of Research (India) — as the representative of Pakistan asked the organization to provide information on any advocacy and awareness-raising activities carried out in the last 2 yrs, and the representative of China requested more information about the group’s human rights literacy workshops, in addition to about those workshops’ options for funding; Direct Concentrate Community Aid (Pakistan) — as the representative of India inquired the organization to clarify precisely why no activities are listed in its website’s “upcoming events” section; Peace Without Limitations (PWL) International Organization, Incorporation. (Switzerland) — as the associated with Türkiye asked for information on specific projects as well as their result; Association de la femme saharienne pour le développement intégré (Morocco) — as the representative of Algeria asked the organization to provide details about its cooperation agreements with local authorities; Stichting Mideast Youth (Netherlands) — as the representative of Algeria asked for information regarding its relationship with the Government; Tamdeen Youth Foundation (Yemen) — as the representative of India requested the organization to provide additional information about its “localization initiative”; All Survivors Project Foundation (Liechtenstein) — since the representative of Nicaragua asked the business to provide audited financial reports for the last three years; Fundación Ciudadanía con Desarrollo (Ecuador) — because the representative of Cuba asked which usually international organizations provide the group’s funding, and how the latter is able to maintain its independence; The middle for Justice and Responsibility (United States) — as the representative of China asked about just how it used funds obtained; and Human Rights Activists (United States) — as the representative of Pakistan asked for details about projects undertaken to promote economic, interpersonal and cultural rights; The Global Imams Council (Australia) — because the representative of Algeria asked for details regarding its philanthropic financing; Nature Labs (India) — as the representative of Pakistan asked for details regarding health-care projects the organization undertook over the last 3 years;
Continuing Session, Non-Governmental Organizations Committee Recommends 8 Groups with regard to Special Consultative Status, Postpones Action on 84 Others
Related News